[The following is an interview of Girish Kasaravalli I did for the latest issue of Projectorhead magazine. Talking in person to the director whose films I deeply admire was a rather revelatory experience in that it not only cleared me of many misconceptions about these works, but also exposed interesting differences between how a filmmaker conceives his films and how a viewer receives them. Heartfelt thanks to founders/editors Gautam and Anuj for giving me this opportunity]
Your films are rife with rituals, ceremonies and legitimization games. This is perhaps most apparent in Ghatashraddha (1979), your debut feature. What interested you in dealing with such conservative constructs?
Although they are present in the later films as well, rituals and ceremonies are central only to Ghatashraddha. I wouldn’t say I am interested in rituals or castes as such. I liked the scenario of Ghatashraddha, which is about this pair of people Yamunakka and Nani who are marginalized and outcast by this religious institution. She is a young woman who naturally feels the need for male companionship. Nani, otherwise rather sharp, finds it difficult to learn these scriptures. Both of them are ridiculed and outcast by the establishment.
Your direction of Meena Kuttappa in the film is highly stylized. It is not exaggerated, but it is not natural either. It is almost Bressonian. This kind of acting is not found elsewhere in your filmography.
Yes, we were familiar with Bresson’s cinema that time and Meena’s performance is similarly very stylized. It was a de-dramatization gesture. Much of our acting assumes that emotions are to be expressed. I wanted the emotions to be expressed not through the acting but the events of the story. Throughout the film, Yamunakka stays in a single register of suffering. Nani, on the other hand, undergoes a marked change. He realizes that he has to help Yamunakka. While he cannot do a whole lot, he does what his strength and age allows him to. That is why, his performance, along with other characters, is more naturalistic. Even the lead performance in Thayi Saheba (1997) is stylized the same way.
(Full interview at Projectorhead)

August 8, 2011 at 12:46 am
Awesome!!! Though I’m not too familiar with Girish Kasaravalli’s body of work, it was great reading the interview. And yes, many congratulations to you! No many people get this terrific opportunity to meet as well as interview a filmmaker whose work you admire.
August 8, 2011 at 8:23 am
Thanks Shubhajit!
August 8, 2011 at 9:50 am
Congratulations indeed Srikanth!!! This is way more than a feather, it’s a major accomplishment! There are great questions and responses, and while I am unfamiliar with this artist I am more than fascinated with the similarity to Bresson. Kudos to you!
August 9, 2011 at 12:36 am
Thanks Sam! It was an enlightening experience, to say the least.
August 9, 2011 at 9:15 pm
Congrats JAFB. Great interview. I am so happy you got this opportunity :) I have only met a few directors whose work I admired in person but found I was usually tongue-tied but your questions show plenty of thought and composure.
August 12, 2011 at 7:41 pm
Thanks so much, Sachin!
August 16, 2011 at 1:26 am
Excellent job JAFB – this makes for an excellent read – great opportunity, great interview and great writing! Keep shining that light of yours on such invaluable film makers and cinema. A very intellectual discussion might I add – and Girish K certainly knows his cinema.
August 16, 2011 at 7:54 am
Thanks for the very encouraging words, Omar.
August 30, 2011 at 9:52 am
This is great!! :):)