(Warning: No spoilers in the review. However, storyline and characters are revealed. Proceed at your own risk)
Finally here. Passing through its quota of controversies, production delay and legal attacks, Aascar Films’ Dasavatharam has finally made it to its destination. Dubbed as the most expensive movie made in India, the film has been in the making for over two years. If it was Sivaji – The Boss for 2007, it is very much Dasavatharam for this year. Apparently, the time between consecutive movies of Kamal Haasan has been larger than that of Superstar Rajnikanth‘s. The promos have been, surprisingly (for a Kamal movie), extremely low key. So, have the team’s efforts paid off? Let’s see.
The movie opens in a non-traditional fashion (for Indian cinema) with a preface that recounts the spat between the Shivites and the Vaishnavites of the south during the 12th century. Rangarajan Nambi (Kamal Haasan) is a staunch Vaishnavite who does not wish to relinquish his ideology even at the cost of his life. Rangarajan is portrayed as a very strong person, physically and mentally. As a result, he is dumped into the sea along with the prime Vishnu idol. Cut to the 21st century, where the remainder of the story is to take place. It is December 2004. Govind Ramasamy (Kamal) is a biological scientist in the US and is involved in developing a powerful biological weapon for the military of the country. Govind decides to hand over the formula to the FBI when he senses that the weapon sample is all set to reach unsafe hands. Things take a difficult turn when the package is couriered to India by mistake. Govind manages to track down the package in the intention of returning it to the officials. He is closely tailed by Chris Fletcher (Kamal), an ex-CIA and a mean trigger-happy machine and Jasmine (Mallika Sherawat). This character, with his near-invulnerability and I-don’t-stop-at-nothin’ attitude , is reminiscent of T-1000 of Terminator 2: The Judgement Day (1991).
The rest of the film follows Govind’s attempts to retrieve the weapon and escape the gunpoint of Chris. He is assisted by Andal (Asin), the grand daughter of Krishnaveni Srinivasan (Kamal) who does no help by dropping the package into a Vishnu idol. Andal is not only a love interest for Govind but also his antithesis. The atheistic, borderline-scientologist Govind is balanced by the whole-hearted theist Andal. She completes him, romantically and ideologically. Chris and Govind are also being followed by the local police led by Balram Naidu (Kamal), a true-blue “Andhrite”, who provides a rip-roaring comedy both with his accent and his lines. And there are Shinghen Narahasi, a Fujitsu master and the brother of Govind’s dead friend Yuki, Kalifullah, an overgrown yet innocent Pathan, Avatar Singh, a Punjabi pop star with a Tamil Nadu connection, Vincent Poovaragan, a Nagercoil-based activist and environmentalist and George Bush, the president of America (played by Kamal, Kamal, Kamal, Kamal and Kamal respectively!) whom Govind meets on his pursuit. The most appealing character is definitely of Vincent Poovaragan, the most humanitarian of all the characters in the film. He stands against the unquestioned plaguing of the nature by humans for monetary benefits and faces trouble for the same. The script draws a parallel between Rangarajan Nambi and Vincent Poovaragan (apart from the more obvious adversarial relation between Govind and Rangarajan), both of whom go down fighting for their principles and what they think is the meaning of their existence.
The film’s narration is fraught with twists and suspense but can be boiled down to a large treasure hunt. As a consequence, it is action right from the word “go” with no questions asked. Hand-to-hand combat, gunfight, car chases, daredevil stunts – you have them all. With the characters consisting of a Hindu, a Muslim, a Christian, a Sikh, a Buddhist and even an atheist, it is but inevitable that the story has slight religious overtones. The film, however, does not hurt the sentiments of anyone and even silently calls out for religious tolerance in the society. Believers and non-believers would just have reinforced their respective faiths at the end of the film without contradicting each other, which itself is a success for the movie.
Though all the ten characters are given considerable screen time to make it seem like they all have equal weights, only a few of them actually contribute to the plot and take the story forward. In fact, one feels that a couple of characters could have been entirely done without. As a result, many scenes involving the non-pivotal characters become fillers for the shallow central motive. But one does not complain because something new (a new character for most of the time) pops up regularly to keep you engaged. Only after the ten characters are familiarized that you realize that the film has been extended needlessly. After this point, the film is nothing but overlong is spite of the adrenaline that’s oozing out of the screen. It is now a unanimous feeling that the climax could have been trimmed down.
It is just a formality to speak about Kamal Haasan’s performance. Right from the impeccable accents (especially the Nagercoil accent) to the don’t-tell-me-he-is-acting body-language (George Bush and Krishnaveni noteworthy), Kamal has put in more than everything to realize the film. It is not that his performance is worthy of such a grand movie, but it is his performance that has made Dasavatharam a grand movie. I, however, would personally like to see him in roles such as Shaktivel (Devar Magan), Balu (Sagara Sangamam) and those of Erland Josephson and Philippe Noiret, without much concentration on make-up. But nobody nowadays has the guts to produce such films. Asin‘s performance, which is like a torchlight amidst a Supernova, is going to go unspoken. She has done justice to the charater(s), to say the least. The (remaining!) minor characters are done satisfactorily by Kamal regulars Nagesh, Santhanabharathi, Ramesh Kanna and Vaiyapuri to name some.
K. S. Ravikumar‘s midas touch is alone what Kamal needed for this otherwise one man show and he has got that. With long pseudo-takes used at proper places, the movie “appears” to have larger than life cinematography. Himesh Reshamiyya‘s music is at times melodic, at times bubbly and at times jarring. Devi Shree Prasad‘s inspired but spirited background score has nothing to complain about. It is a known fact Kamal gets carried away with prolonged stunt sequences and Dasavatharam is no exception to that. Some illogical scenes corrupt the otherwise decent stunt sequences that are saved by the CG most of the time. A special mention for the CG that is seamless in scenes where multiple characters appear and also in many shots in the initial and final part of the film. Much is talked about the make up which is really fantastic agreed, but the harsh lighting exposes the prosthetics’ and makes one a bit alienated from the character. The editing is so prudent about the run-time that one can feel how large the original footage was. Huge production values in the preface speak for themselves.
There are two things Indian cinema has always been haunted by – Religion and Science. No one (fabulous exceptions always there) has dared to pass a judgement or even to make a documentation of these two issues. Dasavatharam, though superficial, tries to blend these two concepts into the simple narrative and that too, in such a risky venture. For this reason alone, one can argue for the movie. It is not something new to the medium altogether, but is definitely like nothing that Tamil cinema has never tasted before. Dasavatharam may not be what Kamal wants, but is very much what his fans want.
P. S.: Be alert to spot the brief homage to Martin Scorsese’s Taxi Driver (1976) in the film!
Verdict:
June 13, 2008 at 10:17 pm
too tempting to read . but i am not goin to.
jus scrolled up and down the page..
ll be back but after a few days. :)
LikeLike
June 13, 2008 at 10:22 pm
sure, but read after you have watched it :)
LikeLike
June 14, 2008 at 10:28 am
[…] June 14, 2008 by Just Another Blogger This post is not about the movie but the experience. You can get the review here. […]
LikeLike
June 14, 2008 at 12:30 pm
Just now watched the movie. A nice review. Mirrored most of my thoughts. I too felt its a good blend of science and religion given together with a masala package. I think at last Kamal has found a way to deliver his philosophical ideas to the masses after his brute-force approach in films like Anbe Sivam failed.
LikeLike
June 14, 2008 at 12:35 pm
He never intends to deliver his ideas to the public. In Dasavatharam, he just wants to balance the seemingly theistic interpretation to everything with what may be his true ideology… And yes, it is a pity that Anbe Sivam failed…
LikeLike
June 14, 2008 at 3:05 pm
good review da………the songs mukunda mukunda and oh oh sanam and their picturisation are very good too…..but one would say that the film carries a lot and lot of things and its definitely difficult to be understood in b and c centres…..
LikeLike
June 14, 2008 at 3:10 pm
Thanks; Ya, Thanks to the jam packed editing, some things are bound to go over the average film goer’s head…
LikeLike
June 15, 2008 at 11:15 am
(Spoilers ahead. Skip this comment if you have not seen the film)
The Chaos theory interpretation of Dasavatharam and the Sci-fi aspects to it are more or less obvious for the viewer to grab. Having a Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, a Sikh and even an atheist in the story, the film obviously has a religious layer to it. So I would like to make one point about that thread.
Rangarajan Nambi dies saving the idol. Ironically, here, man (Nambi) tries to save god (idol). Trust Kamal to place his ideological cue here. Kamal suggests that man (Nambi) here is indeed God (remember Anbe Sivam!) and the Idol/God is a mortal. Nambi is the Jesus figure of the story. He tries to help his people and their faith but is humiliated and stoned by the people and pierced with pointed objects by the ruling empire (resembling the crucification of Jesus). Nambi has failed to save his people and God (the idol).
Cut to 2004. Nambi is resurrected (read Jesus like ressurection) and is here as Govind. Hence the cross mark on his forehead (band aid). A lot of clues suggesting the resurrection include the facts that both Nambi and Govind get hurt on their forehead protecting what they think is vital. In the final scene, Govind suggests that him and Andal have already joined. It is upto Govind to fulfil Nambi’s incomplete prophecy which he does. He saves the so-called-God (idol) and sustains the faith of the people on God/him (Andal says “Neenga hero than, adhula sandeham illa”)
At the end of the film, theists will say “God saved man” whereas atheists will say “Man saved god”!
LikeLike
June 15, 2008 at 10:19 pm
I felt some of the more moving, if short scenes in the movie projected the good in men. One was the scene where Poovaragan is asked if anyone from his group (read Dalit) knows to read. That a person from such a background is fighting not for his people, but everyone was touching. I also really appreciate Kalifullah’s scene, where he, an innocent if misled Muslim is subjected to immediate and total suspicion. This is a sad reality today, and it would have been nice if the character had been fleshed out further, so the point could have been hammered home.
LikeLike
June 16, 2008 at 2:00 pm
Yes true, and Kamal’s performance generates the perfect pathos for these characters. But somewhere, these characters seem to have been lost.
LikeLike
June 17, 2008 at 12:50 am
interesting indeed (your last comment)
LikeLike
June 17, 2008 at 5:09 pm
i found one thing in the movie tat set me thinking(apart from the stuff stated above)..
in the 12th century kamal’s(rangarajan) life was more important to ppl than the vishnu idol… but in present day scenario the vice versa was portrayed.. for me this is a question on whether we are progressing forward??
another thing which caught my attention was kamal’s dialogue in the climax “naan kadavul illa nu sollala iruntha nalla irukkum nu solren”
but the graphics was a let down.. i expected more…
LikeLike
June 17, 2008 at 7:01 pm
Nice point… It shows how things have turned upside down in more than 1 way…
LikeLike
June 19, 2008 at 9:48 am
just another thought :)
is rangarajan trying to show tat shaivites and vaishnavites are equal or vaishnavites are better.. coz the lyrics of “kallai mattum” imply both these ideas…
LikeLike
June 19, 2008 at 11:01 am
Neither, he is trying to show how people had no job to do except think about god and fight for it which still continues…
LikeLike
June 19, 2008 at 10:37 pm
i meant rangarajan’s thought not kamal hassan’s. I meant the character’s thoughts in the movie.
LikeLike
June 19, 2008 at 11:00 pm
Hmmm… I did not listen to the lyrics so well… will let you know as soon as I hear it properly…
LikeLike
June 21, 2008 at 10:06 am
i am quoting it for u..
“Ettil Aindhu Enn Kazhiyum Endrum
Aindhil Ettu Yaen Kazhiyadhu”
“Seivam Endru Paarthaal Dheivam Theriyadhu
Dheivam Endru Paarthaal Samayam Kidaiyadhu”
LikeLike
June 21, 2008 at 10:10 am
I guess he is speaking for the Vaishnavas only here…
LikeLike
June 24, 2008 at 10:51 am
Mama, vitu prichita po….
LikeLike
June 24, 2008 at 11:58 am
Thanks da, Never said you had a site. Nice design too
LikeLike
June 25, 2008 at 5:22 am
I cannot get the Taxi Driver homage. Care to explain? :)
LikeLike
June 25, 2008 at 10:20 am
Hi Adithya,
When Narahasi asks Fletcher, at the end, to get ready to die, he looks back and says “You, Talkin’ to me?”
LikeLike
June 25, 2008 at 12:50 pm
dasavataram rocks. i enjoyed it scene by scene except for this one.
santanabarathi: nee enna ulaga nayagana?
kamal: aamam(seeing the camera) naan ulaga naayakan thaan.
LikeLike
June 25, 2008 at 1:15 pm
Hmmm… The “for fans only” component of the movie
LikeLike
February 14, 2009 at 5:36 pm
[…] of our words and gestures. Hell, no film has even examined what religion means to the common man. Dasavatharam (2008) teased us with the possibilities, but stopped there. This is the biggest taboo of them all. […]
LikeLike
February 26, 2009 at 2:28 pm
Whats the taxi driver link?
LikeLike
February 26, 2009 at 2:29 pm
Hi Nishanth
When Narahasi asks Fletcher, at the end, to get ready to die, he looks back and says “You, Talkin’ to me?”
(from above comment)
LikeLike