Pulijanmam (2006) (aka Tiger Birth)
Priyanandan
Malayalam
Director Priyanandan’s National Award winning Pulijanmam (2006) charts the efforts of a middle-aged, true-blue communist playwright Prakash (the recently deceased Murali Nair) who is about to stage a play based on a folk legend about a highly-skilled man, Kari, of the lower caste who defies god and enters the dark woods, assuming a tiger incarnation, to bring back tiger mane in order to cure the madness of the ruler. “Every generation takes what it wants from a story” says Prakash early on. For one, he sees himself as a reincarnation of Kari and the play as some sort of a self-portrait. History and mythology merge as Prakash finds his campaign against religion and against the ruling communist party’s decision to allow corporations to build resorts over farm lands to be increasingly similar to Kari’s inhuman crusade. Writers N. Prabhakaran’s and N. Sasidharan’s ambition to chronicle the fall of communism in one of the nation’s two most left-leaning states is palpable, but Priyanandan’s methods hurt the film beyond recovery. The director resorts to too much cross cutting, trying to thrust the parallel between the two stories down our throats and destroying the intrigue built up by the film’s first half-hour. The cinematography and composition is purely functional, with some flashes of brilliance to hold attention. Then there’s also the script’s tendency to cover too much ground and make a few social observations too many that stick out like a sore thumb. I must say it’s a tad disappointing to see this film being given the Indian National Award for best film over Goutam Ghose’s ideologically kindred and infinitely superior Yatra (2006).
June 1, 2010 at 5:59 am
For some reason I am thinking here of Dennis Arcand’s JESUS OF MONTREAL, which is also about the staging of a play, with religion as the essential underpinning. In any the blending of history and mythology is most interesting, though it appears in the end you are disappointed:
“The director resorts to too much cross cutting, trying to thrust the parallel between the two stories down our throats and destroying the intrigue built up by the films first half-hour. The cinematography and composition is purely functional, with some flashes of brilliance to hold attention. Then there’s also the script’s tendency to cover too much ground and make a few social observations too many that stick out like a sore thumb.”
I don’t know YATRA, but your strong regard for that one makes it essential viewing.
LikeLike
June 1, 2010 at 7:18 am
Ah Sam, but you will. In my decade’s best list at WitD. Yatra is a masterful mix of 8 1/2, Wild Strawberries and Deconstructing Harry, and that’s just the beginning…
LikeLike
June 1, 2010 at 9:08 pm
When Yatra released, it was one of those rare times I’d allowed our so-called film critics to dictate terms to me. The unenthusiastic reviews somehow made me lose interest in the film. But your championing of the Goutam Ghose film might just have done the trick for me :)
LikeLike
June 1, 2010 at 9:24 pm
Ah, Shubhajit. With Rekha in the cast, I thought it would be one of those inane nostalgia rides and skipped it first too. Three or four months ago, I caught it on television (uninterrupted by ads thankfully) and was blown away. Simply put, it is one of the greatest Indian films ever made.
LikeLike
June 3, 2010 at 7:46 am
Wow, that’s saying a lot!!!
LikeLike
June 1, 2010 at 7:18 am
[…] Just Another Film Buff has some issues with an otherwise intriguing Indian film at “The Seventh Art.” As usual the writing is first-rate and the insights compelling: https://theseventhart.info/2010/05/30/ellipsis-6/ […]
LikeLike
June 7, 2010 at 7:26 am
[…] Just Another Film Buff has a magnificent capsule review up at his place on Pulijanman, a critically-praised Indian feature: https://theseventhart.info/2010/05/30/ellipsis-6/ […]
LikeLike