Road, Movie (2009)
Dev Benegal
Hindi
Road, Movie (2009), written and directed by Dev Benegal, follows Vishnu (played by middle cinema darling Abhay Deol), the son of a small time hair oil seller, who borrows an ancient Chevrolet truck from his neighbour and hits the road on the pretext of selling his father’s stock and delivering the truck to its proper destination. Little does he care that the truck doubles as mobile cinema. On his way, he encounters a village in dire need of water where a dacoit group has been terrorizing the villagers, appropriating the available water, bottling it and selling it back to them. A paean to popular cinema of yesteryear, specifically to those times when films used to be a collective social experience that transcended class, race, gender and other disparities, Road, Movie views (and literalizes, as in the carnival segment) cinema, in the Bazinian sense, as a collective dream that acts as a fulfillment ground for our real life desires. Consequently, it laments the death of that collective experience due to corporatization of film production and segmentation of potential markets*. Through plot details, bizarrely enough, it equates cinema to both water (suggesting that both are essentially public commodities unjustly being appropriated for the benefit of a few) and oil (in that both are ultimate stress-busters and great social levelers, as is pointed out in the recurring song borrowed from Guru Dutt’s Pyaasa (1957)). Road, Movie is also self-consciously generic, as its title points out, likening the journey on a road to the trajectory and experience of a movie. True to the conventions of its genre, the individualistic, petit bourgeois protagonist realizes the meaning and importance of living in a community and, among other bromides, that the journey is more important than destination. But then, Benegal also keeps deviating from the genre in that he avoids conjuring up a revolutionary hero out of Vishnu. He may mean good, he might have learned a few important lessons, but he’s as helpless in front of these social forces as he was at the beginning. He can do nothing but go back to his dreary middle class existence. Oh well, at least there’s Tel Malish.
[*See Jonathan Rosenbaum’s review of Sleepless in Seattle (1993) for a detailed examination of the phenomenon]
December 12, 2010 at 5:39 pm
Thanks for this review, I posted an entry on it a few months back but I am getting the sense that very have seen Benegal’s film and those who have are usually won over by the charms of the film. It is one of my film’s of the year for sure. However, it does seem likely now that it will be released in the UK sometime next year. As for the ‘Death of the collective experience’ which you so eloquently put is also quite true given the film’s nostalgia for the past. But I’m still not sure if this is an art film or an example of middle cinema?
LikeLike
December 12, 2010 at 5:50 pm
Yes, Omar. It’s an instantly charming film, and it’s probably the one film that audiences abroad don’t have to ‘adjust’ their cultural antennae to. But isn’t the DVD out in UK also? It is, here.
I’d say it is still middle cinema, especially independent cinema like the Sundance entries. It feels so Mexican as well. Somehow, it’s loose aesthetics compels me to hold it away from the realm of art cinema.
Cheers!
LikeLike
December 12, 2010 at 9:53 pm
Yes, I ordered my copy online from India but as far as I know it has not appeared on the UK DVD market which perhaps tells me a distributor may have picked it up for theatrical release; a lot like Peepli Live.
LikeLike
December 17, 2010 at 5:31 am
I quite liked this film, charming and certainly a tribute to the lure that cinema holds for people. I found it interesting that Benegal uses the water shortage element in a rural setting here whereas he showed this shortage in an urban setting in his earlier film Split Wide Open where the water mafia controls access to the taps. Also, I can’t but help think that this film is similar to the wonderful Brazilian film Cinema, Asprin and Vultures. The cinema in the Brazilian film was ad films but it was downplayed compared to the self journey aspect whereas in Benegal’s cinema, there are moments when the cinema becomes the main focus before the journey gets back on track.
LikeLike
December 17, 2010 at 6:43 pm
Hi Sachin,
Know what? While watching the film, all that was in my mind was “Mexico”! And the Brazillian film you mention sounds eerily similar to this one. I haven’t seen Benegal’s earlier films, so I’ll take that as a recco.
Thanks and cheers!
LikeLike
December 17, 2010 at 10:40 pm
When you see the Brazilian film, you will also notice the similarity in depicting the heat of the land. In Cinema, Aspirin and Vultures, Marcelo Gomes over-exposed the film to give his movie a yellowish tinge which somehow managed to better depict the extreme heat in the Brazilian countryside. Atleast I felt that in the theatre but I have yet to see the film on DVD.
Benegal’s Split Wide Open brings up some interesting points and I enjoyed the film for it’s talk show like gossips. But I have wanted to see his first film English, August for a while since I liked the book so much. I always got a funny look when I inquired about the film in India as no one seemed to carry it. However, the film maybe on the net somewhere but I have not tried to get it.
LikeLike