Tôkyô Orimpikku (1965) (Tokyo Olympiad)
Kon Ichikawa
Japanese
Commissioned by Japan’s national Olympic committee during the Summer Olympics of 1964, Tokyo Olympiad (1965) is a study in forms. Covering the event end-to-end – from the opening to the closing ceremony – Kon Ichikawa’s film is preoccupied with the filmic form as an end in itself, indifferent to if not independent of its ostensible subject. This stance is highly befitting of the project as well, for what are the Olympic Games if not the pure form of war, emptied of all its teleology and historico-political foundation? Each of the sport is filmed, edited and scored with a different style and rhythm, as though trying to develop an impressionistic portrait of the game. Ichikawa is excited by movement and by speed, by an athletic manoeuvre and by a show of sheer force, by the elegance of a gymnastic move and the animality of a shot put throw. His fascination is not with the perfection and beauty of the human body, as it might have been to Leni Riefenstahl, but with the grace of its movement and with the skill it’s capable of. Even when he is fixated on an isolated body part, as is the case with the oscillating derriere of an athlete in a walking event, the interest is less in the anatomical details than with the form of its motion through space and time. Ichikawa, as it were, is proposing why “Citius, Altius, Fortius” could well apply to the medium he is working with too. He also takes the spirit of the Olympics from the outside to the inside, from the frenzy of a mass sport to the simmering moods of an individual. He mystifies by distance, by covering the athletes from a distance and with a brooding voiceover which makes them come across like Zen monks (a stratagem that Chris Marker would employ in his film on Kurosawa). He captures their little quirks, their absurd superstitions and their emotional fragility in vivid detail, which acts as the perfect foil to the extreme physicality of the rest of the film.
April 2, 2012 at 8:35 am
Beautifully penned and splendidly economical review of one of Ichikawa’s most celebrated film, and one where his focus and mission is different than his aim in his other works. I love teh employment here of the words “movement,” “form,” “speed,” “elegence,” and “animality” for the sake of an impressionistic visualization, which as you subsequently note is a perfect foild for what is generally going on here. My absolute favorite Ichikawas are THE BURMESE HARP, FIRES ON THE PLAIN and AN ACTOR’S REVENGE, but this is a very fine work too.
LikeLike
April 9, 2012 at 10:26 pm
Thanks for the excessively kind words, Sam. You’re too generous. These are the 4 films of Ichikawa I’ve in in all, as a matter of fact!
Cheers!
LikeLike