Maqbool (2003)
Vishal Bhardwaj
Hindi
Vishal Bhardwaj’s Maqbool is set in a strangely sparse and ruralized side of Mumbai and tells the story of the rise and fall of Maqbool (Irrfan Khan), the right hand man of underworld lynchpin Jahangir (Pankaj Kapoor, doing a Marlon Brando) and the secret lover of his wife Nimmi (Tabu). Tabu and Irrfan are at the top of their game in this sparkling adaptation of Macbeth, which spins Shakespeare’s portrait of the toxicity of power into a searing study of masculine insecurity. Unlike the will to power of his classical counterpart, Maqbool’s actions are brought about by a kind of necessity born out of amorous desire and sexual jealousy. He is moreover possessed by the idea of legacy and bloodline. To know whether the child from Nimmi is his or Jahangir’s is literally a question of life or death for him because, you know, parricide runs in the family. While Lady Macbeth’s sudden descent into guilt and madness seems quite at odds with the cold and calculated nature of her act, Nimmi’s gradual disintegration is grounded in her perceived failure as a mother, in a doubt that her carnal desire has possibly deprived her child of a father. Her character is a screenwriting coup, for what could easily have devolved into a Grand Scheming Woman archetype is instead made as fully human and conflicted as Maqbool. Bhardwaj builds his world at a leisurely but steady pace and elaborates on The Bard’s lean tale, providing backstories to the originally secondary characters, especially Jahangir whose ignominious prise de pouvoir is but one turn in an unceasing cycle of power struggle. The only witnesses to this eternal recurrence are the two greasy cops (Om Puri and Naseeruddin Shah) who, unlike Macbeth’s Greek chorus of neutral witches, are active participants in the fulfillment of their prophecies by dint of deliberate inaction. Maqbool’s characters live in a limbo between the sacred and the profane – a universe where the pious turn debauchers, loyalists turn traitors and lovers turn murderers. It’s a film of great directorial rigour. The microscopically-tuned cinematography, cutting and performances hit the precise values each scene demands. I’ve put up three of the many extraordinary sequences below. Check out how seamlessly it constructs complete spaces and with what economy and accuracy each gesture, edit and change in framing conveys key details.
May 31, 2015 at 9:19 pm
Love this film, especially the horoscopic images (favorite being the blood on Mumbai’s kundli in the opening scene.)
What are your thoughts on Omkara and Haider? I can see a listing for the latter in the Film Diary but can’t find any piece written on it… Omkara is probably my favorite of the trilogy.
LikeLike
June 1, 2015 at 10:58 am
Despite reservations, I really liked HAIDER a lot. I saw in it a film with real passion and conviction.
Saw OMKARA yesterday. It’s got a lot of terrific passages and some great staging. It also deepens a few of the considerations of MAQBOOL (Omi, Keshu and Rajju are all prisoners of a kind of masculinity that drives some of their actions instead of the rabbit-from-the-hat moves of OTHELLO). The character of Langda is well-updated (again, driven largely by necessity and opportunity than full-on malice) but could and should have gone further. However, I also think becomes unwieldy in the second half. The last half hour exists practically just to move plot. To Bhardwaj’s defense, it is a text that does not lend itself easily to realist cinema as much as MACBETH. It’s ridiculously knotty and melodramatic and has got one impossible expositional setup after another – an inconvenience that is also apparent in OMKARA, which nonetheless tries its best to prune the plot down. The film also is forced to adopt the lack of any agency for the women in the original, and its last ditch efforts in the end do not make up for it. I think it would have been a much better film had it deviated more from the original.
LikeLike
February 18, 2017 at 8:17 am
nice images
LikeLike